The Gravity's Rainbow Support Group (GRSG) began in June, 202o as a "reading group" of two people as a support mechanism to plow though Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow (a book you should never try to read alone) during the pandemic. The GRSG took the challenge out of reading challenging books and provided a way to keep two now-retired college chums ( from Indiana University) Francis Walker of Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Murray Browne of Decatur, Georgia in touch. Basically, we decided to keep this good thing going.
This page is the third installment of our reading-discussion notes of books we assigned ourselves in 2022. Like in the pages past, (See Gravity's Rainbow Support Group and Gravity's Rainbow Support Group - 2021) it is full of favorite quotes and passages. Don't expect coherent prose or well thought out arguments, but our musings may provide insights to your own understanding of these books.
First up:
The Age of Anger: A History of the Present by Pankaj Mishra
Thanks to our Kansas friend Bruce Woods, this book was recommended. We were left scratching our heads wondering why this book wasn't already on our radar. Published in 2017, Mishra gives a wide-sweeping historical account explaining the paranoid hatreds that grip our world tracing its roots of the competing thoughts of Voltaire and Rousseau. Interesting that Rousseau became inspired on the road to visit Denis Diderot not unlike the apostle Paul blinded on the road to Damascus. Buckle up because Mishra provides plenty to think about:
Ressentiment
A major theme in the book, Mishra explains ressentiment on pages 13 and 14.
"But in between justice and ressentiment is a rich gray area where schadenfreude can serve a valuable purpose."
Memorable passages
p. 41 - George Santayana " (America) has always thought itself in an eminent sense the land of freedom even when covered with slaves."
p.45 - "The easy availability of assault weapons in the United States was always likely to assist the privatization and socialization of violence."
p.65 - "The appeal of democracy, broadly defined as equality of conditions and the end of hierarchy would grow to the paradoxical point where Fascists, Nazis and Stalinists would claim to be the real democrats realizing a despair principle of equality." (Of course, this is true in 2022 as Republicans use the argument that they are preserving democracy as they block the Voting Rights Act and the John Lewis Bill)
This week in Georgia. On Monday (1/10/22) in the Georgia General Assembly praised UGA and predicted an upcoming victory over Alabama in the College Football Championship. My (Murray) reaction on Tuesday was "Now that the Georgia has won the National Football Championship it can get back to the business of suppressing voter's rights."
p.68 - Dostoyevsky and the dangers of the Crystal Palace, a glass and iron structure built by Joseph Paxton in 1851 in London. An embodiment of utopian future, but with acute dangers. (Kind of like Disney World)
P.80 - Blue collar Christians in the Rust Belt, post-communist Poland, Muslims in France push Victimhood.
From Francis
Page 90 –This one sounds a bit like social media and its overbearing effect on people.
"Everyone is tyrannized by the fear of other people’s opinion. The airs of politeness conceal a lack of fidelity and trust. Survival in the crowd seems guaranteed by conformity to the views and opinions of whichever sectarian group one belongs to. The elites engage meanwhile in their own factional battles and presume to think on behalf of everyone else." --It continues--
Page 91 "Such a society where social bonds are defined by a dependence on other people’s opinion and competitive private ambition is a place devoid of any possibility of individual freedom."
Page 98 - The top-down analogy is a good one—and it does a good job summarizing what a lot of us have felt from time to time about administrative no-nothings that issue dictates to those of us trying to get a job done:
"Voltaire was an unequivocal top-down modernizer, like most of the Enlightenment philosophes, and an enraptured chronicler in particular of Peter the Great."
Page 56 - The following comment seems relevant since we discussed if Orwell was an ideologue or an idealist—this is a nice take on a dialogue being an ideologist—in which personal viewpoints serve to keep up one’s membership in a group.
"(Not accidentally, one of the philosophes, Helvetius, founded the modern theory of ideology: the notion that ideas express the conflicting interests of individuals or groups.)"
Page 90: - I liked this comment, because it talks about masks—which of course are the current rage in Paris—although not for fashion.
"Take for instance his epistolary novel Julie, ou La Nouvelle Héloïse (1761), whose socially outcast protagonist Saint-Preux is exactly the author’s own age. He arrives in glittering Paris to find in it ‘many masks but no human faces’."
Page 107: - Finally, this is one of the authors sweeping generalizations (he tries to bury in parentheses) again anti-male and a bit over the top. The book editor should have tamped this one down a bit—but, maybe he is referring to India where maybe it is not that far off within certain subcultures….
"Any equality between the sexes, according to him, should be based on different roles in distinct domains of activity; and the demand for women to be educated like men, and increased similarity between the two sexes, would lessen the influence women have over men. (The rapid overturning of these entrenched prejudices in our time is one major source of male rage and hysteria today.)"
Some of the passages reminds Francis of the conservative writer Roger Scruton that seem to echo themes of the book:
- ...Dealing with anger and resentment should not be seen along a liberal-conservative divide, rather they need to be viewed as emotions that can easily deteriorate if are put in place untampered as policies—which then become the enemy of all of us.
- The modern world gives proof at every point that it is far easier to destroy institutions than to create them. Nevertheless, few people seem to understand this truth - "Rousseau & the origins of liberalism," The New Criterion (October 1998) wikiq
- Liberty is not the same thing as equality, and that those who call themselves liberals are far more interested in equalizing than in liberating their fellows. Roger Scruton "The Limits of Liberty," The American Spectator (December 2008)
- Conservatism is a philosophy of inheritance and stewardship; it does not squander resources but strives to enhance them and pass them on. "Stand up for the real meaning of freedom," - The Spectator (January 2014)
- Never in the history of the world have there been so many migrants. And almost all of them are migrating from regions where nationality is weak or non-existent to the established nation states of the West. They are not migrating because they have discovered some previously dormant feeling of love or loyalty towards the nations in whose territory they seek a home. On the contrary, few of them identify their loyalties in national terms and almost none of them in terms of the nation where they settle. They are migrating in search of citizenship which is the principal gift of national jurisdictions, and the origin of the peace, law, stability and prosperity that still prevail in the West.
Second session, Monday, January 31, 2022
“There is nothing new in the world except the history you do not know.” -- Harry Truman
This quote seems most appropriate because Mishra shows us clearly that the arguments, the patterns of tyranny, fascism, and radical nihilism etc. has repeated itself over and over from the mid-18th century of Voltaire and Rousseau to the Trump, Modi and ISIS era.
Francis has other notes and quotes:
- “The most fanatical engineers of the human soul, such as Chernyshevsky, Dobroliubov and Stalin, were either children of priests or seminarians (like, remarkably, Al‑e‑Ahmad, Shariati, Qutb and many Islamist ideologues). “—Mishra, page 157
- “They are driven by what Freud once called the ‘narcissism of small difference’: the effect of differences that loom large in the imagination precisely because they are very small.” –Mishra, page 158
An older colleague of mine put it this way: “The fights at University faculty meetings are so intense, because the stakes are so low.”
- “Georg Forster, the writer and activist, who fled a failed mini-revolution in the German city of Mainz to Paris (to die there embittered in 1794), wrote to his wife that ‘the tyranny of reason, perhaps the most unyielding of all, lies yet in store for the world’.” ----Mishra page 186
This statement reminds me of two aphorisms:
We know that the war against intelligence is always waged in the name of common sense.” ― Roland Barthes, Mythologies
“Damn the solar system! bad light — planets too distant — pestered with comets — feeble contrivance; — could make a better with great ease." ---Sydney Smith (letter to a friend who complained about everything, maybe even gravity….)
- “Georges Sorel, the most influential thinker of fin de siècle France, insightfully noted in Reflections on Violence (1908) that Mazzini, while apparently pursuing a ‘mad chimera’, confirmed the importance of myth in revolutionary processes. ‘Contemporary myths lead men,’ Sorel affirmed, ‘to prepare themselves for a combat that will destroy the existing state of things.’ “ --Mishra, page 228
When myth meets myth, the collision is very real, --Stanislaw J. Lec Unkempt Thoughts. 1962
- “The militant Zionist Jabotinsky, who was then a pacifist student in Rome reporting on Italian events to his compatriots in Odessa, spoke of the ‘malcontento’ in Italy and ‘the ‘incredible dissatisfaction’ which ‘would sooner or later lead to rebellion’.” Mishra page 233
- “The modern terrorist tradition has many such instances of zealous pupils exceeding their master.” Mishra page 309,
Here is the concept expressed somewhat differently: One repays a teacher badly if one always remains nothing but a pupil. --Fredrich Nietzsche
- “The violence was aimed at different political ends. But it was inspired by the belief – fundamental to much modern terrorism – that assaults on symbols of political and social order, and the self sacrifice of individuals, had a propaganda value that far exceeded any immediate political ends.” Mishra page 314
Anarchists and Orwell
Interesting that in our previous book Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia, Orwell described himself as a member of the Anarchist party, but the Orwell sided with the anarchists for fundamental changes in Spain (democratic socialists) are not to be confused with the Trotsky-Lenin-Stalinist Communists or the anarchist movement that Mishra writes about. (To the Anarchists "capitalist democracy is no more than a centralized swindling machine." We did not realize that it was so widespread worldwide most notably the assassination of William McKinley and the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand in Bosnia which led to World War I.
Speaking more about this, Mishra writes (p116) that “Anarchist spectacles were meat and drink to the newspaper sensationalist media making anarchist militancy more widespread that it was.” (Not unlike the alt-right extremists that stormed the Capital on January 6th.
- “Barcelona, where a series of bombs exploded from 1903 to 1909, causing widespread terror and panic, became known as the ‘city of bombs’. The random attacks caused a precipitate decline in the tourist trade and provoked the city’s affluent class to flee to safer locations.” Mishra page 314
Francis adds - See discussions on Homage to Catalonia by George Orwell, which highlighted the adaptability of the Barcelona elite—during the revolutionary phase in the 1930s they all dressed as commoners and called each other comrade until the tide changed, and then they resumed their distinct social distance and formal mien.)
Then there is quote from Orwell’s 1984 (Mishra 325)
“Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football*, beer and above all, gambling filled
up the horizon of their (the Proletariat) in control was not difficult” (* of course Orwell was referring to soccer, but when nearly 50 million people watch the NFL playoffs with plenty of gambling on the side and beer ads…"
Is there hope in this book?
There is amazing scholarship and synthetization (look at the 25 pages of Bibliography Essay at the end), but no hope. Francis described the author as almost ranting. The final paragraph of: “…that the present order, democratic or authoritarian, is built upon force and fraud; they incite a broader and more apocalyptic mood than we have witnessed before. They also underscore the need for truly transformative thinking about both self and the world.”
Or this quote from page 324 about the destruction of faith “Today, the belief in progress, necessary for life in a Godless universe, can no longer be sustained, except perhaps, in Silicon Valley mansions of baby faced millennials.
Not much hope there BUT WITH ONE TINY EXECEPTION the mention of Gandhi and Simone Weil in the same sentence on page 250: “Gandhi together with Simone Weil was among the 20th century thinkers who questioned the emphasis on rights – the claims of self-seeking possessive individuals against others that underpinned the expansion of commercial society around the world. They too said that a free society ought to consist of a web of moral obligations.”
Hmmm. Further discussion perhaps?
Mountains and a Shore: A Journey Through Southern Turkey by Michael Pereira
After the draining Mishra, book we opted for something lighter and since Francis has plans for a trip to Turkey in the fall, we selected this book, which we discussed on February 21, 2022.
Originally published in 1966, Paul Dry Books republished the book in 2015. In this thin travelogue, Pereira combines the history of the country with his solo travels along the southern Mediterranean coastline and Taurus Mountains. (The map above is from the book.) Because Pereira speaks Turkish and insists on traveling the way that the locals do: by foot, by donkey if necessary, and the most common mode of transportation— the bus. He writes:
“…the role played by buses is of immense importance, and I came away with nothing but admiration for them and their drivers. For they have to contend with the trains, bridges washed away or simply non-existent, and, by no means the least, other Turkish drivers.
To help them overcome these hazards they very reasonably enlist the help of the Almighty, and in the space above the windscreen is always written some brief prayer or exhortation. Some of these are pious rather than comforting, such as: ‘May God protect you!’ and others, to my mind, needlessly eschatological: ‘Forget not thy God!’… The most popular of all, however, is the single word ‘Maşallah’, which used in much the same way as a Spaniard uses the sign of the cross to avert danger.”
You feel every bump in the road as he travels the mountainous swerving roads often overlooking the Mediterranean. Pereira’s purposely traveled to an area of a country that he believed would be much more developed in the upcoming decades.
His descriptions of the kebabs, and the centuries-old churches and muezzins’ calls to prayers from the minarets reminded me of my trip to Turkey with my partner Denise in 201o. Books like Pereira’s expand what I normally think of as a travel book. Sometimes you read a travel book with a purpose to plan an upcoming trip or to be a companion while traveling, but Mountains and A Shore, provided a respite from our daily routine by reliving memories of our trip to this fascinating country. (I cannot forget our visit to the Hagia Sophia and the pickle shop in Istanbul.)
Orhan Pamuk Essays
As a companion to the Pereria book, I pulled the Turkish Nobel Laureate Orhan Pamuk's collection of essays Other Colors (2007) off the shelf. I skipped around the first two sections "Living and Worrying" and "Books and Reading." Pamuk's essays from pages 61 to 104 about living with earthquakes and boat trips on the Bosphorus are good. In the second section his essays about Mario Vargas Llosa's Death in the Andes and Salman Rushdie's' Satanic Verses caught my attention, but it was Pamuk's republished forward to Tristam Shandy that has given GRSG some direction.
It is time to do a classic work of literature (uh-oh) and we selected the Laurence Sterne's The Life and Opinions of Tristam Shandy, Gent. written between 1760-1767 as a novel which will require support from a fellow reader.
The Life and Opinions of Tristam Shandy Gentleman by Laurence Sterne
We selected this classic of English literature written between 1760 and 1767 for several reasons:
1. We were overdue for another hard-to-read, lengthy book that is worthy of the support group. In 2020 it was Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow and last year it was Faulkner's Absalom, Absalom. In other words, we need mutual support to get through a book of this nature.
2. While reading some Orhan Pamuk essays for our book on Turkey, one of the pieces on Tristam Shandy.
3.) I already had a copy of the Modern Library edition that I purchased for 30 cents years ago. (Of course, the print was too small) so I purchased a very good hardback copy of the Britannica Great Books edition from Eighth Day Books in Wichita, Kansas which is a great source for ol' timey literature books.
4.) And we cannot connect Laurence Sterne to one of the stars of The Age of Anger the French philosopher and writer Voltaire. Both Sterne and Voltaire were more than acquaintances with French philosopher Denis Diderot (1713-1784). Sterne and Diderot met in 17??)
Plot
"Digressions, incontestably, are the sunshine;— they are the life, the soul of reading!—take them out of this book, for instance, —you might as well take the book along with them; " instance," Book I, Chapter 22. (in Bartlett's Book of Quotations)
"So long as a man rides his hobby horse peaceably and quietly along the king's highway, and neither compels you or me to get up behind him--pray sir, what have either you or I to do with it." Book 1, Chapter 7 (in Bartlett's) Define: hobby horse.
There is very little plot. The narrator Tristam Shandy gives an account of his life starting from his conception. For details he relies on his Uncle Toby, an ex-military man and the dialogue often the dialogue between Tristam's father Walter (a scholar) and Pastor Yorick (who represents religion). Our narrator spins digressions and digressions within digressions and often talks to reader directly. At one point in Book IV, Chapter 25 the page numbers skip from page 270 to 283 on purpose. He writes:
The group (of Francis and me) agreed you could say this book is like Seinfeld "a book about nothing."
The Humor
Other Strengths
The Universality of the Human Condition
Examples include:
Corporal Trim's sermon on conscience, which ends with two or three short rules, including "your conscience is not the law." Book II, Chapter 17.
"Sterne moves form the problems of ethic into the general theory of knowledge; his satire is moral, but his comedy is epistemological." -- essay, Art & Nature the Duality of Man by Martin Price.
"What a jovial and a merry world would this be, may it please your worship, but for that inextricable labyrinth of debts, cares, woes, want, grief, discontent, melancholy, large jointures, impositions, and lies!" - Book VI, Chapter 14.
The Humor/The Use of Languages
Countless examples of Sterne's use of language-- his wit:
"When one runs over the catalogue of all the cross reckonings and sorrowful items which the heart of man is overcharged."
"The hand of death pressed heavily upon his eyelids." - Book VI, Chapter 10
It's easy to imagine Monty Python quoting some of these passages in a skit where he describes the birth of Tristam: "for it was obstetrical,--scriptural, squirtical, papistical--and as far as the coach-horse was concerned in it--caball-istical--and only partly musical." Book III, Chapter 8
The nun's story:
The abbess of Andouillets,…… being in danger of an Anchylosis or stiff joint (the sinovia of her knee becoming hard by long matins), and having tried every remedy—first, prayers and thanksgiving; then invocations to all the saints in heaven promiscuously—then particularly to every saint who had ever had a stiff leg before her—then touching it with all the reliques of the convent, principally with the thigh-bone of the man of Lystra, who had been impotent from his youth—then wrapping it up in her veil when she went to bed—then cross-wise her rosary—then bringing in to her aid the secular arm, and anointing it with oils and hot fat of animals—then treating it with emollient and resolving fomentations—then with poultices of marsh-mallows, mallows, bonus Henricus, white lillies and fenugreek—then taking the woods, I mean the smoke of 'em, holding her scapulary across her lap—then decoctions of wild chicory, water-cresses, chervil, sweet cecily and cochlearia—and nothing all this while answering, was prevailed on at last to try the hot-baths of Bourbon—so having first obtained leave of the visitor general to take care of her existence—she ordered all to be got ready for her journey: a novice of the convent of about seventeen, who had been troubled with a whitloe in her middle finger, by sticking it constantly into the abbess's cast poultices, &c.—had gained such an interest, that overlooking a sciatical old nun, who might have been set up for ever by the hot-baths of Bourbon, Margarita, the little novice, was elected as the companion of the journey.
The Quotes
"There is a Northwest Passage to the intellectual world," - Book V, Chapter 42 (in Bartlett's book of quotations - Bartlett gives him Sterne two pages.)
Sterne on families:
Though in one sense, our family was certainly a simple machine, as it consisted of a few wheels; yet there was thus much to be said for it, that these wheels were set in motion by so many different springs, and acted one upon the other from such a variety of strange principles and impulses—that though it was a simple machine, it had all the honour and advantages of a complex one,—and a number of as odd movements within it, as ever were beheld in the inside of a Dutch silk-mill.
Why Tristam Shandy Is a Classic
People who read only the classics are sure to remain up to date. -- Maria von-Ebner Eschelbach
“A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.” –-Mark Twain
In John Sutherland's Lives of the Novelists: A History of Fiction in 294 Lives, he calls Tristam Shandy "English literature's greatest comic novel." He further explains why:
Technically what Tristam Shandy bequeathed to English fiction was immediacy - "writing to the moment." His sign manual is the dash —typically a 5em thing which lubricates the frictionless pace of narrative (speeding up one's reading of the process). Tristam Shandy, with its expressive typography (super large capitals, different fonts, the creative use of white space and blocked pages) is a tribute to the growing skill of the mid-eighteenth century London printing trade. The fluidity Sterne aimed at was that of speech. "Writing" he wrote, "when properly managed (as you may be sure I think mine is) but a different name for conversation.
In other words, as demonstrated in the examples below, Sterne did things on the printed page that no one had done before as well as things that we accept as normal in writing.
Final Thoughts
Yes, Tristam Shandy qualifies as a classic. With respect to Maria von-Ebner Eschelbach, it is a book that is timeless in its subject matter, because it deals with the foibles of the human condition. And it qualifies because as we discovered its style and point of view was revolutionary for its times.
That's not say it doesn't qualify in terms of Mark Twain's definition of a classic as book that no one reads. Some of us found it much more a challenge (Murray) than others (Francis). A worthy choice for the GRSG.
Grant by Ron Chernow
This 2017 biography hits the vortex of books we've read:
- We like voluminous books. (This is one is 1000 pages).
- We like history. (Tuchman on Stillwell, George Orwell on the Spanish Civil War)
- We like study different approaches to history (Marc Bloch, Drew Gilpin Faust - who wrote about Shiloh)
- The 200th anniversary of Grant's birth was April 27th, 2022
- Francis and I made a day trip to Shiloh around 1999.
And we must always begin with an Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn from The Gulag Archipelago quote:
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
You can read Chernow's introduction to get a strong sense of how from the depths of failure ("Grant had been a failure, better by life at every turn." - beginning to Chapter VI) to the Presidency in less than a decade (similar to Harry Truman). And his toughness, as he persevered through the excruciatingly painful throat cancer to finish his Memoirs. And there were his demons with alcoholism and reoccurring headaches from malaria that he contacted while crossing the isthmus of Panama enroute for his tours of duty in the Pacific Northwest.
In our discussion, which took us to the brink of the Civil War. We couldn't help comparing our current riven country between the division between the abolitionist North and the slaveholding, States rights South. Well, we all know how that ended.
Some of Francis favorite quotes:
Jesse (Grant’s father) contributed to a lively newspaper called The Castigator that made its local debut in 1826.
About Grant’s first taste in America’s (imperialistic) War Against Mexico where he served with Robert E. Lee, who Grant said “was not endowed with supernatural abilities.” (This would serve Grant well in the Spring of 1864).
“(Zachery) Taylor was not a conversationalist, but on paper he could put his meaning so plainly that there could be no mistaking it. He knew how to express what he wanted to say in the fewest well-chosen words.”
While some nearby officers mocked Grant’s take-charge style of leadership, Taylor promptly endorsed it: “I wish I had more officers like Grant, who would stand ready to set a personal example when needed.” (on Grant--showing his soldiers how to do a menial task)
During his maiden battle, Grant discovered something curious about his own metabolism: he was tranquil in warfare, as if temporarily anesthetized, preternaturally cool under fire.
This early experience made Grant tend to view war as a hard-luck saga of talented, professional soldiers betrayed by political opportunists plotting back in Washington.
Francis Memorable Passages from the book Grant:
Colonel Walter Gresham of Indiana wrote admiringly of Grant: “The grasp General Grant then exhibited in the teeth of the incompetency of Halleck and the inefficiency in the War Department stamped him, at least in the eyes of his subordinates, as a man of force and genius.” Page 196
Gresham is especially meaningful since Francis and I lived in Foster Quad during our undergrad days at Indiana. The dining hall was named after Gresham. - Murray
Grant’s endurance in the face of unexpected setbacks perhaps owed something to having survived the ups and downs of his own improbable life before the war. Page 207
“Grant had been a failure, battered by life at every turn. (p.114). It is a remarkable part of biography of how a man who could not have been a more miserable failure in business, with his father and father-in-law etc. in 1860 could be President of the United States, eight years later.
He (Grant) talked less and thought more than anyone in the service.” Page 364
In Halleck’s topsy-turvy world, it was more important to look and act the part of a general than to win battles and crush the enemy. Esse quam videri. Cicero (To be rather than to seem—(good))
Grant approved it with startling speed. Rusling asked Grant if he was sure he was correct. “No, I am not,” Grant shot back, “but in war anything is better than indecision. We must decide. If I am wrong we shall soon find it out, and can do the other thing. But not to decide wastes both time and money and may ruin everything.” Page 330
Grant broke it open and mutely weighed its meaning. “There was no more expression in Grant’s countenance than in a last year’s bird nest,” observed a journalist. Page 504
The tone of Grant’s reminiscence (after Appomattox) confirmed the Duke of Wellington’s adage that “next to a battle lost, there is no spectacle more melancholy than a battle won.”page 508
Evidently Lee relaxed when he realized Parker was a Native American. “I am glad to see one real American here,” he ventured, shaking his hand. To which Parker retorted memorably: “We are all Americans.”page 509
As he (Grant) remarked bitterly, “The Southern generals were [seen as] models of chivalry and valor—our generals were venal, incompetent, coarse . . . Everything that our opponents did was perfect. Lee was a demigod, Jackson was a demigod, while our generals were brutal butchers.” Page 516
One aspect of the book is that it really demythologizes Robert E. Lee. Grant met Lee during the Mexican War and they served together. “Lee was not an immortal…was not endowed with supernatural abilities.” (Chapter 3). This would serve Grant well when they faced off in 1864. Grant was not in awe of Lee. Chernow makes the point that Lee was a tactician, but Grant was the strategist. “Grant was the strategic genius produced by the Civil War.” (p.370). (Lee hamstrung himself by always making defending Richmond his main priority.) Chernow debunks arguments that Lee fought for Virginia. He fought for the Southern way of life as well.
Grant’s brilliance was on display during the Vicksburg campaign, the lifting of the siege of Chattanooga and even the campaign to entrap Lee in Richmond. Vicksburg and the Richmond campaign required handling the many rivers that made Confederate positions strong. As Francis pointed out the Russians have similar difficulties in the Ukraine.
A few relevant aphorisms/adages that might apply to Grant:
One of the unpardonable sins, in the eyes of most people, is for a man to go about unlabeled. The world regards such a person as the police do an unmuzzled dog, not under proper control. - T.H. Huxley, 1893.
Francis adds: I think that lacking prepossessing height or bearing, Grant with his introversion and inscrutability made it possible for others, particularly his enemies, to ascribe to him whatever labels served their interests best.)
How gracefully, or not, one loses in life generally matters much more to one’s present happiness than how spectacularly one succeeds. --Matthew Stewart (The management myth page 145)--(There are other presidents to whom this would apply as well--FW)
Grant is similar to Lincoln in this manner since Lincoln was judged by his “railsplitter” appearance. According to Shelby Foote, I believe, Lincoln’s true strength is that he understood how individuals judged him and used that to his advantage. In this Topp Civil War trading card from the 1960s. Lincoln makes a mental note that Grant is staring at his hands.
A few relevant aphorisms/adages that might apply to Grant:
One of the unpardonable sins, in the eyes of most people, is for a man to go about unlabeled. The world regards such a person as the police do an unmuzzled dog, not under proper control. - T.H. Huxley, 1893.
Francis adds: I think that lacking prepossessing height or bearing, Grant with his introversion and inscrutability made it possible for others, particularly his enemies, to ascribe to him whatever labels served their interests best.)
How gracefully, or not, one loses in life generally matters much more to one’s present happiness than how spectacularly one succeeds. --Matthew Stewart (The management myth page 145)--(There are other presidents to whom this would apply as well--FW)
Many a man will have the courage to die gallantly, but will not have the courage to say, or even to think, that the cause for which he is asked to die is an unworthy one. -Bertrand Russell
Maria von Ebner Eschenbach Quotes
A true friend contributes more to our happiness than a thousand enemies to our unhappiness. (i.e. Rawlins)
Control of the moment is the control of life.
What people and things are worth can only be determined when they have aged.
Fate hits us with hard or soft blows. It depends on the material we are made of.
It takes less courage to be the only one who finds fault, than to be the only one to find favor.
As a youthful Civil War buff, I learned quite a bit about the Civil War, the different generals and their shortcomings. I learned much about the Vicksburg campaign and the year between Shiloh and Vicksburg. This includes the Van Doren raid on the supply depot at Holly Springs Mississippi. (This is mentioned in the Faulkner novel Absalom, Absalom which we read.) Van Doren destroying the Union supply depot changed the war dramatically. It was from that point on that Grant and Sherman decided that they would forage the Southern countryside for livestock, feed etc. to supplement the army. This played a huge roll in Sherman’s March to the Sea.
As a youth in addition to collect Civil War trading cards, I pretty much had memorized Heroes in Blue and Gray and I would say even though the book was scaled down considerably to a 6th grade reading level it did not sacrifice accuracy. The book does mention Grant’s drinking, where Lincoln when confronted about Grant’s drinking he quips, “What brand? I should send it to my other generals” According to Chernow (page 292) Lincoln says he never remembered saying that, but wouldn’t mind taking claim for the quote.
Post Civil War Discussions
We both agreed that the most striking aspect of the book (among many) is the Chernow's writing about Reconstruction. We both knew very little beforehand and were not aware of Grant's efforts to "operationalize "Lincoln’s emancipation proclamation (a fine Francis phase).
An abolitionist before the war (more so than Abraham Lincoln) Grant was a fervent believer that blacks should be able to vote without intimidation, hold office and during his first term he enacted laws to strengthen the rights to vote (i.e. the Ku Klux Klan violence, which was “unquestionably the worst outbreak of domestic terrorism in American History.”). He used Federal troops to disembowel the nascent Ku Klux Klan and created the Department of Justice to indict and convict over a thousand Klansmen. (A reincarnation of the Klan was formed in the 1920s.) In other words, this was only a short period of time as the white Southerners power structure reformed new militant groups like the White Rifles. This coupled with Northern “Reconstruction fatigue” contributed the evaporation of black voting rights.
Chernow maintains that it would be another 96 years after the 1872 election (1968) before a fair election would be held in many parts of the South. “Slavery had been abolished,” writes Chernow, “but it had been replaced by a caste-ridden form of second-class citizenship for southern blacks, and that counted as a national shame.”
(We agreed knowing this makes the debate over Critical Race Theory even more shameful. We hope they are teaching the entire story about Reconstruction in the classroom, but we suspect not.)
Grant the Centerpiece
Other pleasures of the book is learning more about Grant's cohorts: William Tecumseh Sherman, a loyal friend and comrade in arms, but not always sure of Grant's judgement as a President, a businessman or a parent. (Sherman took one of Grant's f-off sons under his wing for a while.) We also get good idea what a fireball Phil Sheridan was like and what a bastard the impeached President Andrew Johnson was and how a comparison to Donald Trump - a twice impeached President is most fitting.
On the other contrasts between Grant and Trump are most striking (we sometimes get sidetracked in our discussions):
1.) Grant graduated from West Point in 1843; Trump enrolled in Fordham on a draft deferment.
2.) Grant was an accomplished horseman and at the age of five could ride a horse standing on one leg; Trump cheats at golf.
3.) Grant led soldiers and demonstrated courage under enemy fire; Trump told employees "Yer fired" on a tv show.
4.) While on a military excursion in Panama Grant personally attended to soldiers suffering from malaria; Trump suggested those suffering from COVID-19 might consider drinking bleach.
5.) As a military leader, Grant led the Union to victories at Fort Henry, Fort Donelson, Vicksburg, Chattanooga and eventually forced Lee to surrender at Appomattox; Trump withheld weapons from Ukraine.
6.) Grant was an alcoholic but overcome it by total abstinence; Trump is an uncurable pathological liar.
7.) Grant was impoverished after for being fleeced by partners in questionable business ventures; Trump boasted about fleecing others with dubious business practices that made him wealthy.
8.) Grant operationalized Lincoln's emancipation proclamation; Trump encouraged restrictions on voting.
9.) Grant won a second term by a landslide; After losing an election for a second term, Trump attempted a coup to overturn the results of the election.
10.) Under duress, Grant vowed to defend Congress from mob attack; Trump incited a mob to attack Congress.
Mark Twain
At the end of his life, Grant was swindled in a Ponzi scheme that left him penniless. Adding to his misery Grant's health turned for the worse, suffering from throat cancer (too any cigars) which would claim his life. Fortunately, an important writer and publisher of the time—Mark Twain— stepped in. Twain admired Grant and felt that he could restore Grant’s wealth by publishing the general’s memoirs. While in intense pain, Grant finished Personal Memoirs just a month before his death and the book eventually sold 300,000 copies, providing his devoted wife Julia with generous royalties.
Twain did have one complaint about the book Grant had not addressed his struggle with alcohol. It was a contest, Twain reckoned, as huge as any of the titanic battles he had fought and won. “I wish I had thought of it!” Twain exclaimed with frustration. “I would have said to General Grant, ‘Put the drunkenness in the Memoirs—& the repentance & reform. Trust the people.’” But he knew that no hint of that existed in the narrative, that it had been too sore a point with Grant, who, in his quiet, inscrutable way, carried his private thoughts on the subject to the grave.
Not so for Chernow who detailed Grant's alcoholism throughout the book.
